Please sign the J7 RELEASE THE EVIDENCE Petition


Fully Featured & Customizable Free Forums
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Welcome to the July 7th People's Independent Inquiry Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:

SSL Search:  

Pages: (9) « First ... 7 8 [9]  ( Go to first unread post )

 Riots 2011
Bridget
Posted: Feb 26 2012, 09:44 AM





Group: J7 Admins
Posts: 15,207
Member No.: 2
Joined: 26-November 05



QUOTE
Paratroopers readied for future social unrest in UK
By Paul Stuart
25 February 2012

Repressive techniques perfected in Northern Ireland are being deployed for the first time on the British mainland.

The Daily Telegraph has reported that soldiers from the elite 3rd battalion of the Parachute Regiment are engaged in counter-riot training exercises.

Government officials have downplayed the possibility of deploying the parachute regiment during civil unrest like last summer’s urban riots, but the character of the exercises conducted at the Lydd military base in Kent tells a different story. The training consisted of how to arrest rioters in scenarios recreating last August’s riots that involved fighting running battles with groups of protesters.

The Parachute regiment has been at the forefront of all the post-war colonial operations. On January 30, 1972, commanders of the Parachute regiment deployed on the streets of Northern Ireland opened fire on unarmed Irish civil rights protesters in Derry, killing 13 and wounding 17. More recently, in 2006, they have been deployed in the Helmand province of Afghanistan.

Commanding officer Major Richard Todd stated, “Many of the drills are no different to what the Roman Army used to do, with highly disciplined soldiers advancing forward under the protection of shields. The key to dealing with large, hostile crowds is control and knowing when and how to react to what is happening in front of you.”

“This training is about getting soldiers used to facing a high pressure situation so they don’t overreact if they have to face it for real,” he said.

The Daily Telegraph article concluded, “Defence sources have confirmed that if violence were to return to British cities, especially during the Olympic Games, the Paras would be ‘ideally placed’ to provide ‘short-term’ support to police forces around the UK.… As well as 3 Para, the Army has another unit known as the ‘Public Order Battalion’, also trained to deal with rioting, bringing the total number of troops to around 1,500.”

As the economic crisis deepens and hostility to the Tory/Liberal Democrat coalition government intensifies, the ruling elite is preparing a violent crackdown against an inevitable social upheaval.

The Home Office is considering a range of repressive weapons to be deployed during civil unrest. They include water cannon, chemical irritant projectiles, increased numbers of officers trained to fire plastic bullets, aerial spy drones and a new weapon that fires a blinding light that has been developed at the Clyde-based Photonic Security Systems.

The Daily Telegraph reported, “The laser, resembling a rifle and known as an SMU 100, can dazzle and incapacitate targets up to 500m away with a wall of light up to three metres squared. It costs £25,000 and has an infrared scope to spot looters.”

Paul Kerr, the firm’s managing director, added, “The system would give police an intimidating visual deterrent. If you can’t look at something you can’t attack it.”

The blinding device was pioneered by a Royal Marine Commando based on similar models used by troops in Afghanistan to deter insurgent attacks on military convoys. A Home Office spokesman said it will be piloted by at least one police force.

The Sunday Times reported other new weapons being considered. According to the Home Office, tasers and CS gas operated over a short distance, exposing an operational deficiency to be rectified by a longer-range “wireless electronic incapacitator,” and the use of “chemical irritant projectiles.”

A recent government report into the police handling of the riots concluded, “The Metropolitan Police has increased the number of officers trained to deploy with baton gun teams so that teams can be deployed more flexibly if and when required.”

Last December, the Daily Telegraph reported that the London Metropolitan Police (the Met) has been in detailed discussions with the Association of Chief Police Officers to buy three water cannon.

The Met has announced that the number of arrests connected to last summer’s riots is approaching 4,000. According to a statement by Detective Superintendent William Lyle, there have been 3,864 arrests across London, of which 2,385 have either been charged or summonsed. So far, 1,331 have been sentenced, with 645 given “custodial sentences.”

The national picture of arrests is now well over 5,000 and growing. In England’s second city, Birmingham, total arrests stand at 770, with a further 149 images still on public display. Of these, 297 have been charged with 169 convictions. In Manchester, 390 arrests have been made, with 200 appearing in court.

Lyle explained how teams of “officers have now viewed the majority of the 250,000 hours of CCTV footage recovered, with an estimated 45,000 hours left remaining.” They were “releasing further images of those we are seeking.”

The poorest districts of London continue to be the scenes of large-scale police operations, with 5,000 officers deployed across 32 boroughs in a three-day “blitz” against gangs, leading to 500 arrests. Vans patrol the streets covered with large screens displaying images of those the police accuse of being involved in the August riots.

Paratroopers readied for future social unrest in UK
Top
Bridget
Posted: Jul 17 2012, 04:19 PM





Group: J7 Admins
Posts: 15,207
Member No.: 2
Joined: 26-November 05



QUOTE
BBC lawyers consider formal appeal over court ban on riots drama

Lawyers ponder challenge to ruling preventing docu-drama from being broadcast 'by any media until further order'

    Paul Lewis and Josh Halliday
    guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 17 July 2012 16.05 BST

UK Riots
Police in front of a burning car during riots in Hackney in August 2011. Photograph: Dan Istitene/Getty Images

Lawyers for the BBC are considering making a formal appeal against a court order that has banned the corporation from showing a dramatised film about the experiences of rioters who took part in last summer's disorder.

The ruling from a judge prevented the docu-drama, which had been due to be broadcast on BBC2 at 9pm on Monday, from being broadcast "by any media until further order".

The channel's executives were forced to pull the film, which is based on the testimony of interviews conducted for the Guardian and London School of Economics research into the disorder.

A second BBC film in the two-part series, which is based on personal interviews with police officers and was scheduled for broadcast on Wednesday, is also banned under the order.

For legal reasons, the Guardian cannot name the judge who made the ruling, the court in which he is sitting or the case he is presiding over. However, it is understood that lawyers for the BBC strongly object to his ruling, the nature of which is believed to be highly unusual.

Hours before Monday's programme was due to be aired, the BBC tried and failed to appeal the order over the telephone. The corporation's lawyers are now working on legal arguments for a second, formal appeal.

The programme, part of a two-part series, features actors who play anonymous rioters speaking about their experiences of the riots last August. The BBC said in a statement on Monday: "A court order has been made that has prevented the BBC from broadcasting the programme The Riots: In their own Words tonight. We will put it out at a later date."

The script from the programme, written by the award-winning playwright Alecky Blythe, was produced from verbatim transcripts of interviews conducted as part of the Reading the Riots study, which conducted confidential interviews with 270 rioters.

The ban on the film has created a major headache for BBC executives, who are being forced to reorganise a packed schedule, which includes Olympic coverage and journalism based around next month's anniversary of the riots.

The BBC did not give details about the nature or contents of the court order. However a copy seen by the Guardian states: "It is ordered that the BBC programme 'The Riots: In their Own Words' due for broadcast on BBC 2 tonight is not broadcast by any media by any means until further order." Another part of the ruling states: "Further the clip currently available for viewing on the BBC website be removed forthwith."

The clip referred to by the judge appeared on a blog posted last Friday, in which a BBC producer on the project said that using the "important and illuminating" interviews in the drama would provide insight into "why and how the riots had happened". The clip, a short preview of the actors playing rioters speaking about their experiences, has now been removed from the site - although the blog remains.

BBC lawyers consider formal appeal over court ban on riots drama | Media | guardian.co.uk
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Create a free forum in seconds.
Learn More · Register for Free

Topic OptionsPages: (9) « First ... 7 8 [9] 



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.0967 seconds | Archive
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike2.5 License.
Comments on this forum do not necessarily represent the views of the July 7th Truth Campaign, the July 7th People's Independent Inquiry Forum, or even the position of their author. J7, the July Seventh Truth Campaign, the July 7th People's Independent Inquiry Forum, nor its administrators or contributors are liable for any of the forum content. Any and all information is reproduced on a 'fair use' basis which allows reproduction of material for research and study purposes, criticism and news reporting.