Please sign the J7 RELEASE THE EVIDENCE Petition


Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today.
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Welcome to July 7th People's Independent Inquiry Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:

SSL Search:  

Forum Rules Inquest Transcripts

| Inquest transcripts reproduced courtesy of: http://www.independent.gov.uk/7julyinquests/ | PDF transcripts are here: http://julyseventh.co.uk/j7-inquest-transcripts/ |

Pages: (4) « First ... 2 3 [4]  ( Go to first unread post )

 FOIs: Information released during the Inquests
cmain
Posted: Feb 9 2012, 09:49 PM





Group: J7 Forum Team
Posts: 1,295
Member No.: 16
Joined: 19-January 06



Perhaps we could suggest to the Met that they look more carefully for the "missing" viewing log, based upon South Wales Police had "destroyed documents" all the time.
Top
Bridget
Posted: Jul 5 2012, 04:52 PM





Group: J7 Admins
Posts: 15,106
Member No.: 2
Joined: 26-November 05



QUOTE (Bridget @ Jan 24 2012, 10:49 AM)
QUOTE
Complaint against the Metropolitan Police Service[Ref. FS50430180]

From:    casework@ico.gsi.gov.uk
To:    julyseventh@fastmail.net
Date:    Tue, 24 Jan 2012 9:49 AM

24 January 2012

Case Reference Number FS50430180

Dear J7

I have been allocated the above complaint to investigate. This relates to a request that you made to the Metropolitan Police Service (the “MPS”) on 28 June 2011 for a full copy of its Theseus Report.

The complaints handling process

Where possible, the Information Commissioner aims to resolve complaints informally. If we believe a public authority should take further action we will ask it to do so. Similarly, if we decide a public authority has dealt with your request properly, and we do not believe that further action is required, we will give you the opportunity to withdraw your complaint.

I will ask the MPS to revisit your freedom of information request, now that we are involved, and consider if there is anything it can do to resolve matters quickly. If there is, I will contact you again.

If not, I will ask it to explain the way it handled your request and will carefully consider its reply.

If we are not able to resolve the case informally, the Information Commissioner will explain his decision in a ‘decision notice’. Where he decides that a request has not been handled properly, he may specify the steps he considers necessary to resolve the situation in the notice. This can include requiring a public authority to release information it has previously withheld.

If we write a decision notice in this case, we will send a copy to you and the public authority. We will also put a copy on our website with your details removed. If you disagree with our decision, you have a legal right of appeal to the Information Tribunal.

The scope of my investigation

The focus of my investigation will be to determine whether or not the MPS is able to rely on the exemption at section 32(1) to withhold the Theseus Report.

It usually takes about four months to complete an investigation and I will update you on my progress. However, if you have any queries, you can email me or call me on 01625 xxxxx. Please ensure that you quote the above case reference number in any correspondence.

Please will you confirm receipt of this email and also that you still wish me to proceed with my investigation

Regards
Carolyn Howes
Senior Case Officer

____________________________________________________________________


The ICO’s mission is to uphold information rights in the public interest, promoting openness by public bodies and data privacy for individuals.

If you are not the intended recipient of this email (and any attachment), please inform the sender by return email and destroy all copies. Unauthorised access, use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted.
Communication by internet email is not secure as messages can be intercepted and read by someone else. Therefore we strongly advise you not to email any information, which if disclosed to unrelated third parties would be likely to cause you distress. If you have an enquiry of this nature please provide a postal address to allow us to communicate with you in a more secure way. If you want us to respond by email you must realise that there can be no guarantee of privacy.
Any email including its content may be monitored and used by the Information Commissioner's Office for reasons of security and for monitoring internal compliance with the office policy on staff use. Email monitoring or blocking software may also be used. Please be aware that you have a responsibility to ensure that any email you write or forward is within the bounds of the law.
The Information Commissioner's Office cannot guarantee that this message or any attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted and amended. You should perform your own virus checks.
__________________________________________________________________

Information Commissioner's Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 5AF
Tel: 0303 123 1113 Fax: 01625 524 510 Web: www.ico.gov.uk

Sorry, forgot to post this:
QUOTE
Reference: FS50430180
Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA)
Decision notice
Date: 23 April 2012
Public Authority: The Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service
Address: New Scotland Yard
Broadway
London
SW1H 0BG

Decision (including any steps)

1. The complainant has requested a copy of the Theseus Report (the “Report”), which relates to the bombings in London on 7 July 2005. The Information Commissioner finds that the Report is a court record and that it was properly withheld under the absolute exemption at section 32(1)(a). The Commissioner found that the public authority made procedural breaches in providing a late response. The Information Commissioner requires no steps to be taken.
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Free Forums. Reliable service with over 8 years of experience.

Topic OptionsPages: (4) « First ... 2 3 [4] 



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.0592 seconds | Archive
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike2.5 License.
Comments on this forum do not necessarily represent the views of the July 7th Truth Campaign, the July 7th People's Independent Inquiry Forum, or even the position of their author. J7, the July Seventh Truth Campaign, the July 7th People's Independent Inquiry Forum, nor its administrators or contributors are liable for any of the forum content. Any and all information is reproduced on a 'fair use' basis which allows reproduction of material for research and study purposes, criticism and news reporting.