| · July 7th People's Independent Inquiry Forum · Portal |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
| Pages: (66) « First ... 16 17 [18] 19 20 ... Last » ( Go to first unread post ) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| indisguise |
Posted: May 12 2008, 04:15 PM
|
||
|
Group: Members Posts: 1,354 Member No.: 139 Joined: 15-August 06 |
|
||
| Bridget |
Posted: May 18 2008, 09:42 PM
|
||
|
Group: J7 Admins Posts: 10,869 Member No.: 2 Joined: 26-November 05 |
|
||
| matt |
Posted: May 18 2008, 11:47 PM
|
||||
|
Group: Members Posts: 3,034 Member No.: 157 Joined: 12-September 06 |
a vague confirmation that we're all on the front line of their war "against" terror |
||||
| justthefacts |
Posted: May 19 2008, 12:53 AM
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1,985 Member No.: 598 Joined: 5-July 07 |
If this news is what it appears, Blair seems to have done a good thing for once. Anything that gets the army out of policing, I would agree with. It might just be a reshuffle and a change of name though.
Interesting use of the word civilian, I didn't notice that at first. What was the war, did we miss the declaration? When the armed forces 'Resilience' set up mass mortuary trucks, to take control of post-mortem examination away from Home Office pathologists, you would expect some nation had declared war on this one. It's suggested in court that the two July plots were linked via a time period when two people both disappeared into Pakistan. No evidence was shown that they had met each other. And Pakistan is officially our ally of course. It would be interesting to know which non-civilians the firing squad were looking for. |
| justthefacts |
Posted: May 19 2008, 03:14 PM
|
||
|
Group: Members Posts: 1,985 Member No.: 598 Joined: 5-July 07 |
|
||
| Staraker |
Posted: May 20 2008, 12:02 PM
|
||
|
Group: Members Posts: 161 Member No.: 761 Joined: 25-September 07 |
It can't necessarily be regarded as a purely a military term, as the police use it interchangably with "member of the public" as opposed to "criminal" all the time. Just been wading through this, by an ex-ARV copper, and he uses "civilian" in this context frequently. |
||
| matt |
Posted: May 20 2008, 03:23 PM
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 3,034 Member No.: 157 Joined: 12-September 06 |
i think you're missing the point that even 'behind the lines' we're still on the front line and that the nomenclature of the war zone is being normalised
it shouldn't be in this never ending war "against" terror, there is no thin red line, the front line of this perpetual battle is three [four] dimensional and infinite, and it runs through you in several axes This post has been edited by matt on May 20 2008, 03:24 PM |
Pages: (66) « First ... 16 17 [18] 19 20 ... Last » |
![]() ![]() ![]() |