Please sign the J7 RELEASE THE EVIDENCE Petition


SSL Scroogle J7:

J7 forum     J7 site     J7 blog     web

Pages: (3) 1 2 [3]  ( Go to first unread post )

 Goldstone Report
Bridget
Posted: Nov 3 2009, 11:09 AM





Group: J7 Admins
Posts: 10,528
Member No.: 2
Joined: 26-November 05



QUOTE
UN assembly draft urges action on Gaza "war crimes"
Mon Nov 2, 2009 5:51pm EST

* Majority of U.N. member states expected to back draft

* Western diplomats say current Arab draft is unacceptable

By Louis Charbonneau

UNITED NATIONS, Nov 2 (Reuters) - Arab U.N. delegates circulated a draft resolution on Monday that would require Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to bring a U.N. report alleging war crimes in the Gaza Strip before the Security Council.

A special meeting of the 192-nation assembly on Wednesday will debate the U.N. report on the December-January war in the Gaza Strip and vote on the draft resolution.

That report accused Israel and Palestinian Hamas militants of war crimes and was prepared by a U.N. fact-finding commission led by South African jurist Richard Goldstone.

The Arab draft resolution, obtained by Reuters, says the assembly "requests the Secretary-General to transmit the report ... to the Security Council." It also urges Israel and the Palestinians to comply with the report's recommendations for launching investigations into allegations of war crimes.

The draft also tells Ban to report back to the assembly within three months on implementation of the resolution.

Arab and Western diplomats told Reuters there was little doubt a majority of the General Assembly would vote in favor of the Arab draft. But negotiations were underway as Arab delegates sought to persuade Western powers to back the text.

Western diplomats said the United States would most likely vote against the resolution. Unless it is revised, they said, most European delegations would join Washington and reject it.

Resolutions of the General Assembly, unlike those of the Security Council, are nonbinding. But U.N. diplomats say such a resolution would intensify pressure on Israel to launch a full investigation into the actions of its army during the war.

The Goldstone report lambasted both sides in the war, which killed up to 1,387 Palestinians and 13 Israelis, but was harsher toward Israel. It gave Israel and Palestinian Hamas militants six months to mount credible investigations or face possible prosecution in The Hague.

WESTERN DIPLOMATS REJECT ARAB DRAFT

Both Israel and Hamas denied committing any war crimes. Israel has criticized the report as unbalanced and says the 47-nation Geneva-based U.N. Human Rights Council, which commissioned the report, is biased against the Jewish state.

An Israeli official in New York condemned both the report and the assembly's discussion of it. "At a time when we are debating restarting peace talks, this is not helpful to anyone," said the official, who asked not to be identified.

Diplomats said the five veto-wielding permanent council members -- United States, Britain, France, Russia and China -- all agreed that there was no point in bringing the issue to the the Security Council, which meant it was unlikely the 15-nation panel would do anything with the Goldstone report.

The Arab draft resolution does not explicitly endorse a Human Rights Council resolution from last month that censured Israel for its actions in the Gaza war without referring to any wrongdoing by Hamas. The United States voted against that resolution while France and Britain abstained from the vote.

But it does endorse an HRC report that included the resolution. Sudan's U.N. Ambassador Abdalmahmoud Abdalhaleem said it amounted to a full endorsement of the HRC resolution.

"It endorses the Human Rights Council resolution, that is the point," he told Reuters. " And it exposes the double standards that some permanent Security Council members have towards the occupying power (Israel) in Palestine."

Several Western diplomats told Reuters the Arab draft was "unacceptable" because of its endorsement of the HRC actions and for requesting Security Council intervention.

Abdalhaleem said the Arabs had rejected an earlier European draft that said the General Assembly would merely "take note" of the Goldstone report and pass the issue back to the HRC.
Top
Bridget
Posted: Nov 5 2009, 09:16 AM





Group: J7 Admins
Posts: 10,528
Member No.: 2
Joined: 26-November 05



QUOTE
Wednesday, November 4, 2009

UNITED NATIONS

House repudiates report on Gaza war


The House on Tuesday condemned a U.N. report that accuses Israeli forces and Palestinian militants of war crimes in the Gaza Strip last winter as "irredeemably biased and unworthy of further consideration or legitimacy."

On a vote of 344 to 36, the House passed a nonbinding resolution that urges President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton "to oppose unequivocally any endorsement" of the report. House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) said the report is "unfair, unbalanced and inaccurate" in its portrayal of Israel's response to attacks from Hamas, the Islamist group that rules Gaza.

The U.N. General Assembly planned to take up the report's findings on Wednesday.

Thirteen Israelis and more than 1,000 Palestinians were killed during the Dec. 27-Jan. 18 conflict.

The 575-page U.N. report accuses Israel of applying disproportionate force, targeting civilians, destroying civilian infrastructure and using human shields in its offensive to stop militant rocket fire. It also criticizes rocket squads affiliated with Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups for attacking Israeli civilians.

source

Dennis Kucinich "Almost As Serious As Committing War Crimes Is Covering Up War Crimes! Youtube
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | Occupied Territories / Palestine | Next Newest »


Topic OptionsPages: (3) 1 2 [3] 



Hosted for free by InvisionFree (Terms of Use: Updated 7/7/05) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.0496 seconds | Archive
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike2.5 License.
Comments on this forum do not necessarily represent the views of the July 7th Truth Campaign, the July 7th People's Independent Inquiry Forum, or even the position of their author. J7, the July Seventh Truth Campaign, the July 7th People's Independent Inquiry Forum, nor its administrators or contributors are liable for any of the forum content. Any and all information is reproduced on a 'fair use' basis which allows reproduction of material for research and study purposes, criticism and news reporting.