Please sign the J7 RELEASE THE EVIDENCE Petition


SSL Scroogle J7:

J7 forum     J7 site     J7 blog     web

Pages: (4) « First ... 2 3 [4]  ( Go to first unread post )

 NATO Mission in Afghanistan, Doomed to Fail ?
justthefacts
Posted: Nov 11 2009, 02:05 PM





Group: Members
Posts: 1,940
Member No.: 598
Joined: 5-July 07



QUOTE
Page last updated at 21:51 GMT, Saturday, 7 November 2009

Pakistan's Taliban dilemma


Afghan voters had to face election fraud in the country

Despite being relatively few in number, the Afghan Taliban are thriving in Afghanistan and Pakistan, as they take advantage of Islamabad's apparent ambivalence towards them, the BBC's Hugh Sykes reports from Kabul.

Despite their fierce reputation, Afghans are mostly gentle, thoughtful people - deeply courteous, with warm humanity that radiates from luminous eyes.

They are also tolerant and very patient.

There was clear evidence of barefaced election fraud, implicitly insulting people who went out to vote believing that their ballots would count. But there has been peace on the streets.

One man said to me this week: "This is all so crazy I've just stopped thinking - and most of my friends are now simply depressed."

And Afghanistan struggles on.

Despite eight years of international assistance, many places in Kabul are a mess.

Simple demands

Major road intersections are pitted with pools of filthy water as wide as streams, and nearly all the deep concrete gutters by the roadside, that I have seen, are stagnant with waste water and rubbish.

And all along these unhygienic streets, food vendors sell their wares from rickety wooden carts. Bananas on many carts, grapes and pomegranates on others.

Almost everyone I have spoken to here on three visits in less than a year has said their demands are very simple: employment, an end to the corruption that's endemic in the Afghan system, and - security.

Security should be simple, one man pointed out: "The Taliban are a small force compared to the British and American armies…you could beat them if you really want."

There is a suspicion here that the entire Western presence is Afghanistan is deeply cynical, misguided, and fundamentally confused.

Rubbish in a Kabul ditch Picture credit: Hugh Sykes
Rubbish piles up in a stagnant ditch in central Kabul

The Afghan Taliban leadership and sources of supply are not even in Afghanistan, they are in Pakistan - in Quetta, a city just across the mountains from Kandahar where so many British and American troops have died.

The charge of cynicism arises because the Americans and the British support the Pakistan government - and the Pakistan government at the same time provides sanctuary in Quetta for the Afghan Taliban who are killing US and British troops.

It is like fighting off the enemy at the front door of your home, but leaving the back door unlocked.

Or - imagine the Chicago Police in the 1920s fighting Al Capone, but turning a blind eye to the gun shops where he buys his weapons and ammunition, and even paying protection money to the owners of those shops.


Haroun Mir, director of Afghanistan's Centre for Research and Policy Studies, told me he cannot understand why this surreal situation is tolerated.

"Pakistan gets away with impunity. And instead of being punished, they are rewarded with US aid."

"Why is American public opinion silent about this?"

What the American public have been hearing on their TV networks has been Secretary of State Hillary Clinton declaring that the United States stands "shoulder to shoulder" with Pakistan.

They have not heard her complaining that Pakistan provides safe haven for the Afghan Taliban who are killing American and British troops.

This double-dealing has to stop, in the opinion of the independent Afghan MP - Dawood Sultanzoy.

He told me that Pakistan should realise that they are creating a "boomerang effect".

"The Afghan Taliban and the Pakistan Taliban are twins," he said, "and America must now get Pakistan to decide if they are an ally or an enemy."

Supply lines

At the moment, Pakistan is both ally and enemy to the USA - ally in the fight against the Pakistani Taliban, but enemy so long as they continue to protect the Afghan Taliban.

Quetta is the crucial element. An entire suburb of that Pakistani city is effectively occupied by the Afghan Taliban and their "Shura" ruling council - including their leader Mullah Omar.


The Afghan Taliban get many of their basic supplies in Quetta - their motorbikes, for example, and their mobile phone SIM cards.

And their supply lines cross the mountains into Afghanistan to the north.

Afghanistan is caught in the middle. Nothing will really change here until this has been resolved.

Pakistan could deny the Afghan Taliban their safe haven in Quetta just across the border from where British and American troops and Afghan civilians are being killed.

The question here in Afghanistan is - why don't they?

Afghan boy. Picture credit: Hugh Sykes
An Afghan child sits quietly while his country faces many troubles [representing a good native]

One answer is that Pakistan has to hedge its bets. As more and more British and American troops die, pressure from the public in Britain and America to withdraw their forces could become irresistible.

The future of the Afghan government of President Hamid Karzai, already stained by election fraud, would then be uncertain. And the chance of the Taliban returning to power here would sharply increase.

They are already waiting in the wings.


On Friday, Nato-led International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) troops from Poland went to a village in Ghazni province south of Kabul. They distributed blankets, and some radios, and they left.

Twenty minutes later, a dozen Taliban arrived on motorcycles and seized the blankets; they set fire to some of them, and took the rest away for themselves.

The Afghan Taliban are well-organised, well-resourced, patient - and they have good sources of intelligence. They should not be under-estimated.

Pakistan needs smooth relations with whoever is in power in Kabul.

Islamabad was one of the very few capitals where the previous Afghan Taliban regime had an embassy. Only two other countries recognised the Taliban government - Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

And after 11 September 2001, the only nation that continued to recognise the Taliban government in Kabul was...Pakistan.


Top
justthefacts
Posted: Nov 12 2009, 11:21 AM





Group: Members
Posts: 1,940
Member No.: 598
Joined: 5-July 07



QUOTE
U.S. Envoy In Kabul Cautions on More Troops


By REUTERS
Published: November 12, 2009

Filed at 5:54 a.m. ET


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, a former military commander there, has expressed deep concern to Washington about sending more U.S. troops, the Washington Post and The New York Times reported on Thursday.

The papers, quoting senior unnamed U.S. officials, said Ambassador Karl Eikenberry expressed deep reservations about the erratic behaviour and corruption in the government of President Hamid Karzai, in classified cables sent in the past week.

Karzai was returned to power last week after a fraud-tainted election. Reports of Eikenberry's dispatches come as President Barack Obama is considering boosting U.S. troop levels in Afghanistan.

General Stanley McChrystal, U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, has asked for 40,000 extra troops that he says are needed to avert failure.

Nearly 68,000 U.S. and 40,000 allied troops are currently deployed in Afghanistan.

Facing increasing U.S. public scepticism over the eight-year-old war, Obama pushed his Afghan war council on Wednesday for revisions in strategy options presented to him.

During the meeting, Obama asked Eikenberry about his concerns, the New York Times quoted officials as saying.

The paper said Obama was considering four options ranging from sending from 10,000 to 40,000 troop and wanted to know how long it would take to see results and be able to withdraw.

The U.S. embassy in Kabul declined to comment on the reports.

"We never comment on confidential communications between the ambassador and the president," an embassy spokeswoman said.

The White House said on Wednesday that Obama had yet to make a decision on troop levels and that he was expected to continue deliberations during a nine-day trip to Asia starting on Thursday.

His press secretary says a decision is still weeks away.

(Writing by Sandra Maler, additional reporting by Peter Graff in Kabul, editing by Jon Boyle)


Top
Bridget
Posted: Nov 25 2009, 01:08 PM





Group: J7 Admins
Posts: 10,516
Member No.: 2
Joined: 26-November 05



QUOTE
Two NATO commanders wore Nazi regalia in Afghanistan
Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:22:38 GMT

user posted image

It has just been discovered that two commanders of the Czech military working under NATO command used Nazi symbols on their helmets during their deployment in Afghanistan.

The story was made public after Czech police serving in Afghanistan reported the case, the Russia Today website reported on Tuesday.

According to the daily Mlada fronta Dnes, the soldiers, identified as Hynek Matonoha and Jan Cermak, wore the symbols of the 9th SS panzer division Hohenstaufen and the SS Dirlewanger brigade respectively, which were probably the most infamous SS combat units of World War II.

Unaware of their sordid actions, Czech Defense Minister Martin Bartak decorated the soldiers for bravery on Friday after their return from Afghanistan.

Later, the minister said that at the time, he had not yet learned about the helmet controversy, which has caused quite a stir among the country's armed forces.

A specialist in extremism, Michal Mazel, has rejected the excuse given by one of the men, who said that he had unintentionally used the symbols.

“He is an elite troop who graduated from university, he is no teenager. The SS symbols on their helmets show a totally perverse view of the world of the NATO military's elite troop,” Russia Today quoted Mazel as saying.

Anti-violence activists say the case with the soldiers is nothing new for the Czech Republic.

“There were several attacks on Roma and other communities in recent years, and these problems in our army, of course, shocked all Czech people,” said Ivona Novomestska, spokesperson for an anti-violence movement.

Petr Prochazka, the commander of the Czech contingent in Afghanistan's Logar province, had ordered that any photographs showing the controversial helmet covers be burnt.

After the facts came out, the commanders were immediately suspended, and they will be facing disciplinary action for their conduct.

Press TV
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | Afghanistan | Next Newest »


Topic OptionsPages: (4) « First ... 2 3 [4] 



Hosted for free by InvisionFree (Terms of Use: Updated 7/7/05) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.0784 seconds | Archive
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike2.5 License.
Comments on this forum do not necessarily represent the views of the July 7th Truth Campaign, the July 7th People's Independent Inquiry Forum, or even the position of their author. J7, the July Seventh Truth Campaign, the July 7th People's Independent Inquiry Forum, nor its administrators or contributors are liable for any of the forum content. Any and all information is reproduced on a 'fair use' basis which allows reproduction of material for research and study purposes, criticism and news reporting.