source

I don't know if this is relevant, but not long after Mel Gibson hit the headlines for his 'anti-semitic rant' at a policeman, I came across an article speculating over his future career in Hollywood, since most of the main players, as in studio heads and financiers were Jewish. The general basis of the article seemed to be that Gibson was pretty much finished in Hollywood because of what he said.

I wonder if this advert originated with somebody other than the public faces. Why single out any one side in all of this? If people want terrorism to stop then only targetting one particular group of terrorists seems to me to be missing the point. Whether or not the situation in the Middle East was initiated by a particular organisation, the terrorists who disproportionately responded should also be asked to stop. Why not simply ask, or demand, for an end to the violence? Perhaps that would be an unpopular suggestion, since it involves taking no 'sides'.