Title: J7: 7/7 Inquests Blog
Description: incl. links & comments
Bridget - October 19, 2010 12:44 AM (GMT)
Bridget - October 19, 2010 07:03 PM (GMT)
I've updated
the CCTV FAIL post with this text and excellent image by Muncher:
The distance between the Thameslink tunnel where this image was captured and the King's Cross underground lines is shown on this map:
Bridget - October 20, 2010 04:14 PM (GMT)
Bridget - October 20, 2010 06:42 PM (GMT)
Bridget - October 21, 2010 11:30 AM (GMT)
Bridget - October 21, 2010 10:06 PM (GMT)
Bridget - October 22, 2010 12:15 AM (GMT)
A couple of comments on
the BFN's link from 'jimbo':
| QUOTE |
| For my money Brigit and co. are scooping this motherfucker and will make journalism history someday. |
| QUOTE |
| So far it appears the J7 site is writing an update and critique daily. This is so good! |
Bridget - October 22, 2010 12:16 AM (GMT)
Bridget - October 23, 2010 10:49 PM (GMT)
Bridget - October 24, 2010 08:25 AM (GMT)
Bridget - October 24, 2010 11:32 PM (GMT)
Bridget - October 26, 2010 03:51 PM (GMT)
Worth quoting:
| QUOTE |
Independent Research? What’s Next, Propaganda In Newspapers?
Posted by bensix under Notes n' Links
It irritates me that some people, like a speaker at News Futures, claim that blogs are parasitic on the mainstream press. No, but ones that do splendid research don’t get much attention. Here, then, is a round-up of amateur investigators…
* The guys and gals at J7 extract more than one head-scratcher from the woefully covered 7/7 inquests. |
Bridget - October 26, 2010 11:33 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
The Home Office "narrative" of the the July 2005 London bombings is coming under judicial scrutiny for first time - albeit without a jury - in the course of the inquests now being held at the Royal Courts of Justice, London
The July 7 Truth Campaign is maintaining a blog examining and documenting the proceedings of the Inquest, including analysis of the hearing transcripts and the evidence presented - J7: 7/7 Inquests Blog |
Bridget - October 27, 2010 08:55 AM (GMT)
Bridget - October 29, 2010 12:06 AM (GMT)
Bridget - November 1, 2010 12:09 AM (GMT)
Bridget - November 2, 2010 11:13 AM (GMT)
Bridget - November 2, 2010 02:20 PM (GMT)
Bridget - November 5, 2010 03:15 PM (GMT)
numeral - November 7, 2010 12:31 PM (GMT)
| CODE |
| http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=151623#151623 |
Very, very nice one, Muncher.
Bridget - November 8, 2010 10:10 AM (GMT)
Bridget - November 9, 2010 01:18 PM (GMT)
Bridget - November 9, 2010 08:24 PM (GMT)
Bridget - November 9, 2010 10:23 PM (GMT)
justthefacts - November 9, 2010 11:46 PM (GMT)
Bridget - November 10, 2010 12:19 AM (GMT)
amirrortotheenemy - November 10, 2010 02:35 AM (GMT)
Bridget - November 10, 2010 02:51 AM (GMT)
Weird - copies all our transcripts and blog posts but no links to us.
Bridget - November 10, 2010 02:54 PM (GMT)
Bridget - November 11, 2010 12:11 AM (GMT)
Sinclair - November 15, 2010 10:24 AM (GMT)
Bridget - November 17, 2010 01:15 AM (GMT)
Bridget - November 17, 2010 08:07 PM (GMT)
Bridget - November 18, 2010 11:00 AM (GMT)
The Antagonist - November 20, 2010 02:16 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
Columba doing the Rumba,
08/11/2010 20:31:42
Stay in tune with the 7/7 Inquest at 77inquests.blogspot.com
And see why the official narrative doens't make much sense. |
| CODE |
| http://www.scotsman.com/uk/77-inquests-Bomb-explosion-was.6617612.jp?CommentPage=1&CommentPageLength=1000#5739469 |
Bridget - November 20, 2010 06:01 PM (GMT)
Bridget - November 21, 2010 10:44 PM (GMT)
Kier - November 22, 2010 08:59 AM (GMT)
Bridget - November 22, 2010 09:02 AM (GMT)
Douglas - November 22, 2010 01:26 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
| How could this data regarding Khan's phone be known if it wasn't extracted from the phone which DS Stuart had earlier stated 'was too damaged to extract data from'? |
I'm not an electronics engineer and my work on phones is a decade old but please bear with me; I will explain this as best I can.
Each phone has a unique Id as part of the circuitry. It is that Id that is actually used in the signals from transceiver to the phone. Software looks up an index on that Id to find the telephone number whenever it is needed.
So, provided the one chip holding the Id is intact - or maybe even the phone's serial number to enquire what Id went into the phone - it should be possible to get to both the call records and cell locations, for the phone. It seems that only call records and cell locations is what they are working from, on that phone, not the address book or anything that the phone itself would hold.
Maybe it would have been nice to query DS Stuart on this but that could only lead to calls then for an expert witness on the subject and before we know what's happened we've stretched this whole thing into a three-year inquest costing 10 times what it needs to. Maybe at an inquiry that would be justified but not at the inquest.
