|
|
Weekend games + Liverpool v Birmingham, 7/8/9 November
| Alias |
|
Thank God you're here.... Cripps has been raped

Group: Members
Posts: 6,930
Member No.: 546
Joined: 25-January 06

|
Over on RAWK there is a poll on who the best manager in the world is... Benitez is winning  I know thats somehwat predicatable on Liverpool forum but God they are deluded.
|
|
|
| Ngog is Boss |
|
Europa League here we come...

Group: Members
Posts: 1,059
Member No.: 1,933
Joined: 20-January 07

|
| QUOTE (Alexander Bong @ Nov 10 2009, 07:12 PM) | | Do you not think though, that the instability of the ownership situation has actually protected Rafa in that his decisions and results aren't being scrutinised as meticulously by fans as a result? |
It has become an excuse for some people who blindly follow the manager.
Us as fans are scrutinising the results, they're nowhere near good enough (which is the fault of Rafa, the team and general unhappiness at the club) but at the same time we know he's a good manager and (cringingly (that a real word?)) we tend not to be too fickle when it comes to managers so we'll give him time.
There will be a time though where if it carries on he'll have fans on his back regardless of the owner situation.
|
|
|
| The Madness of King Jens |
|
Defender of the Earth

Group: Members
Posts: 3,375
Member No.: 1,296
Joined: 1-June 06

|
I'm still racking my brains to work out how this was a "dive" by Ngog. I know Rafa Benitez has come out and said it wasn't a penalty (I imagine he's said that because there wasn't any clear cut contact)
However, in my opinion, Ngog had three options. 1) Stay on his feet and stay standing in which case Carsley comes in at a force that can be career-threatening. 2) Jump over the incoming challenge, thereby allowing the ball (which you previously had control of before the rash challenge of Carsley) to go out of play and letting the crowd get on your back or 3) Jump out of the challenge and make it shown that Carsley had absolutely no chance of getting the ball and that he has, in fact, put you off your stride.
Of those options, no.2 has to be the most honest. However, that is also the option of a team who goes into a game not wanting to win. I'm absolutely certain that had the shoe been on the other foot a Birmingham player would've dived too.
|
|
|
| Ngog is Boss |
|
Europa League here we come...

Group: Members
Posts: 1,059
Member No.: 1,933
Joined: 20-January 07

|
| QUOTE (Alias @ Nov 10 2009, 07:16 PM) | Over on RAWK there is a poll on who the best manager in the world is... Benitez is winning I know thats somehwat predicatable on Liverpool forum but God they are deluded. |
Ya think?
|
|
|
| Ngog is Boss |
|
Europa League here we come...

Group: Members
Posts: 1,059
Member No.: 1,933
Joined: 20-January 07

|
| QUOTE (The Madness of King Jens @ Nov 10 2009, 07:17 PM) | I'm still racking my brains to work out how this was a "dive" by Ngog. I know Rafa Benitez has come out and said it wasn't a penalty (I imagine he's said that because there wasn't any clear cut contact)
However, in my opinion, Ngog had three options. 1) Stay on his feet and stay standing in which case Carsley comes in at a force that can be career-threatening. 2) Jump over the incoming challenge, thereby allowing the ball (which you previously had control of before the rash challenge of Carsley) to go out of play and letting the crowd get on your back or 3) Jump out of the challenge and make it shown that Carsley had absolutely no chance of getting the ball and that he has, in fact, put you off your stride.
Of those options, no.2 has to be the most honest. However, that is also the option of a team who goes into a game not wanting to win. I'm absolutely certain that had the shoe been on the other foot a Birmingham player would've dived too. |
It was a pure and simple dive.  Though you're right in saying 99% of players would dive in that situation. This post has been edited by Ngog is Boss on Nov 10 2009, 07:20 PM
|
|
|
| Alexander Bong |
|
Ultimate Member

Group: Admin
Posts: 18,562
Member No.: 1,605
Joined: 28-August 06

|
| QUOTE (Ngog is Boss @ Nov 10 2009, 07:17 PM) | | QUOTE (Alexander Bong @ Nov 10 2009, 07:12 PM) | | Do you not think though, that the instability of the ownership situation has actually protected Rafa in that his decisions and results aren't being scrutinised as meticulously by fans as a result? |
It has become an excuse for some people who blindly follow the manager.
Us as fans are scrutinising the results, they're nowhere near good enough (which is the fault of Rafa, the team and general unhappiness at the club) but at the same time we know he's a good manager and (cringingly (that a real word?)) we tend not to be too fickle when it comes to managers so we'll give him time.
There will be a time though where if it carries on he'll have fans on his back regardless of the owner situation.
|
Fair point mate - thinking about it - Liverpool fans have given time to managers in the past.
|
|
|
| Whatever |
|
Manager

Group: Members
Posts: 2,139
Member No.: 3,036
Joined: 24-September 08

|
| QUOTE (Ngog is Boss @ Nov 10 2009, 07:19 PM) | | QUOTE (The Madness of King Jens @ Nov 10 2009, 07:17 PM) | I'm still racking my brains to work out how this was a "dive" by Ngog. I know Rafa Benitez has come out and said it wasn't a penalty (I imagine he's said that because there wasn't any clear cut contact)
However, in my opinion, Ngog had three options. 1) Stay on his feet and stay standing in which case Carsley comes in at a force that can be career-threatening. 2) Jump over the incoming challenge, thereby allowing the ball (which you previously had control of before the rash challenge of Carsley) to go out of play and letting the crowd get on your back or 3) Jump out of the challenge and make it shown that Carsley had absolutely no chance of getting the ball and that he has, in fact, put you off your stride.
Of those options, no.2 has to be the most honest. However, that is also the option of a team who goes into a game not wanting to win. I'm absolutely certain that had the shoe been on the other foot a Birmingham player would've dived too. |
It was a pure and simple dive.  Though you're right in saying 99% of Liverpool players would dive in that situation. |
true..at least gerrard is going to have a word with him
|
|
|
| Coney |
|
SCE to AUX

Group: Members
Posts: 23,550
Member No.: 291
Joined: 4-January 06

|
| QUOTE (The Madness of King Jens @ Nov 10 2009, 07:17 PM) | | 2) Jump over the incoming challenge, thereby allowing the ball (which you previously had control of before the rash challenge of Carsley) to go out of play and letting the crowd get on your back |
Well, although there would be no contact in that case, because you were forced off the ball by another player who failed to get the ball, then you have been fouled. That would make it a penalty in the 18 yard box. I don't know why people seem to assume that there has to be contact before it is a foul/penalty.
|
|
|
| Ngog is Boss |
|
Europa League here we come...

Group: Members
Posts: 1,059
Member No.: 1,933
Joined: 20-January 07

|
| QUOTE (Coney @ Nov 10 2009, 08:36 PM) | | QUOTE (The Madness of King Jens @ Nov 10 2009, 07:17 PM) | | 2) Jump over the incoming challenge, thereby allowing the ball (which you previously had control of before the rash challenge of Carsley) to go out of play and letting the crowd get on your back |
Well, although there would be no contact in that case, because you were forced off the ball by another player who failed to get the ball, then you have been fouled. That would make it a penalty in the 18 yard box. I don't know why people seem to assume that there has to be contact before it is a foul/penalty.
|
Don't the actual rules simply say that there needs to be an "infringement" rather than contact? Irrelevant in this case as Carsley was nearer Reina than NGog though.
|
|
|
| Coney |
|
SCE to AUX

Group: Members
Posts: 23,550
Member No.: 291
Joined: 4-January 06

|
| QUOTE (Ngog is Boss @ Nov 10 2009, 08:39 PM) | | QUOTE (Coney @ Nov 10 2009, 08:36 PM) | | QUOTE (The Madness of King Jens @ Nov 10 2009, 07:17 PM) | | 2) Jump over the incoming challenge, thereby allowing the ball (which you previously had control of before the rash challenge of Carsley) to go out of play and letting the crowd get on your back |
Well, although there would be no contact in that case, because you were forced off the ball by another player who failed to get the ball, then you have been fouled. That would make it a penalty in the 18 yard box. I don't know why people seem to assume that there has to be contact before it is a foul/penalty.
|
Don't the actual rules simply say that there needs to be an "infringement" rather than contact? Irrelevant in this case as Carsley was nearer Reina than NGog though. |
Here is the rule for free kicks...
A direct free kick is awarded to the opposing team if a player commits any of the following seven offences in a manner considered by the referee to be careless, reckless or using excessive force: • kicks or attempts to kick an opponent • trips or attempts to trip an opponent • jumps at an opponent • charges an opponent • strikes or attempts to strike an opponent • pushes an opponent • tackles an opponent
It then goes on to say that if any of those offences takes place in the goal area, then a penalty should be awarded.
(http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/affederation/federation/81/42/36/lawsofthegameen.pdf - page 32)
|
|
|
| The Wengerbabies |
|
Chairman

Group: Members
Posts: 7,250
Member No.: 2,030
Joined: 1-March 07

|
| QUOTE (Ngog is Boss @ Nov 10 2009, 07:19 PM) | | QUOTE (The Madness of King Jens @ Nov 10 2009, 07:17 PM) | I'm still racking my brains to work out how this was a "dive" by Ngog. I know Rafa Benitez has come out and said it wasn't a penalty (I imagine he's said that because there wasn't any clear cut contact)
However, in my opinion, Ngog had three options. 1) Stay on his feet and stay standing in which case Carsley comes in at a force that can be career-threatening. 2) Jump over the incoming challenge, thereby allowing the ball (which you previously had control of before the rash challenge of Carsley) to go out of play and letting the crowd get on your back or 3) Jump out of the challenge and make it shown that Carsley had absolutely no chance of getting the ball and that he has, in fact, put you off your stride.
Of those options, no.2 has to be the most honest. However, that is also the option of a team who goes into a game not wanting to win. I'm absolutely certain that had the shoe been on the other foot a Birmingham player would've dived too. |
It was a pure and simple dive.  Though you're right in saying 99% of players would dive in that situation. |
99 out of 100 players would have doen it the hundreth would be Eduardo, tbh
|
|
|
| Coney |
|
SCE to AUX

Group: Members
Posts: 23,550
Member No.: 291
Joined: 4-January 06

|
| QUOTE (The Wengerbabies @ Nov 10 2009, 09:34 PM) | | QUOTE (Ngog is Boss @ Nov 10 2009, 07:19 PM) | | QUOTE (The Madness of King Jens @ Nov 10 2009, 07:17 PM) | I'm still racking my brains to work out how this was a "dive" by Ngog. I know Rafa Benitez has come out and said it wasn't a penalty (I imagine he's said that because there wasn't any clear cut contact)
However, in my opinion, Ngog had three options. 1) Stay on his feet and stay standing in which case Carsley comes in at a force that can be career-threatening. 2) Jump over the incoming challenge, thereby allowing the ball (which you previously had control of before the rash challenge of Carsley) to go out of play and letting the crowd get on your back or 3) Jump out of the challenge and make it shown that Carsley had absolutely no chance of getting the ball and that he has, in fact, put you off your stride.
Of those options, no.2 has to be the most honest. However, that is also the option of a team who goes into a game not wanting to win. I'm absolutely certain that had the shoe been on the other foot a Birmingham player would've dived too. |
It was a pure and simple dive.  Though you're right in saying 99% of players would dive in that situation. |
99 out of 100 players would have doen it the hundreth would be Eduardo, tbh |
99 out of 100 players say that their cats prefer the taste of bottom.
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Track this topic
Receive email notification when a reply has been made to this topic and you are not active on the board.
Subscribe to this forum
Receive email notification when a new topic is posted in this forum and you are not active on the board.
Download / Print this Topic
Download this topic in different formats or view a printer friendly version.
|
|