Who has the best team right now??, i did preseason rankings....

i know seriously..
its INSANELY hard to do the rankings...
anyone could be 1-10, its just a matter of opinion.

yea..that's the only reason i ever placed colts low...he had questions with his #1 RB....i couldnt rank him higher due to that and because well... everyone else has such a good team and less questionable RB..

Other than my own, I think Indy and Atlanta have the best teams.. amazing for Indy since I didn't even see him at the draft. I think they have the most solid starting teams all-around, everyone else (except maybe myself ) has a weakness at some position.

I ranked Pittsburgh and Miami as the bottom two, simply because all the teams are pretty close but they have major QB problems. Both could be better in future seasons, but I can't see them winning this year. I will be shocked if you are still starting Michael Vick by week 10.

Neither of you who did rankings put my team in the top 5, so I think you are going to be surprised by how well I will do this season. I didn't just go the rookie route like Miami did, in picking players who will be good in 2008 and neglecting this first season. But I also didn't pick today's top stars who will be gone soon, like Colts did. I think I drafted younger players who may be peaking this season but who should be around for years to come. Unless something unpredictable happens, my team will be near the top for quite some time.

u dont win with QB's..u win with RB's and WR's..always been the case with fantasy football

That's not really true. RBs are more important because you start two of them. But (other than Priest) QBs usually outscore everybody else, including RBs. It's not usually the hardest position to find a replacement at, but if you can't it's the worst one to miss, and you won't get a lot of wins if you score 0 at QB.

after the first tier of RB's they drop wayy off... the numbers..the kind of years they have...after the second tier there's almost nobody there...

meanwhile.... unless u have the top 3 or 4 QB's..all the rest score the same amount aprroximatelly.....from 150-200 points a year in normal yahoo settings...

so unless u got a top 3 or 4 QB... it's not worth too much unless the rest of ur team is good too

I disagree...
there are plenty of solid running backs who can get you points...
but ur right... after that theres nothing. there are about 10 QBs who are solid enough to get points, but if u dont get 1 of those ur screwed.

not to mention a QB is easier to replace...and i dont know if there are just 10 or more of the ones that can get u points...and if u got chris brown or something as ur number one back..yea he'll get u some points..but he wont be as good as deuce or mcgahee or lt or well u get my drift...

if a RB gets hurt ur pretty much screwed...

Exactly my point...

Not me! *flaunts Larry Johnson and Derrick Blaylock*

RBs are easier to replace than people think. I just picked up two week 1 starters last night. Who would you replace your QB with? Frerotte or Dilfer? THAT = SCREWED.

Not me! *flaunts Larry Johnson and Derrick Blaylock*

RBs are easier to replace than people think. I just picked up two week 1 starters last night. Who would you replace your QB with? Frerotte or Dilfer? THAT = SCREWED.

no ur backup one that u drafted