Robert Spencer is a Temporal Co-Adjutor

[Mark Brewer]

Robert Spencer, who runs jihadwatch.org, is a temproal co-adjutor. I came to this conclusion based on his false claim that pope Benedict XVI opposes Islam. He also claims the Jesuits oppose Islam as well, which we know to be false.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadA...le.asp?ID=17772

Irrespective of the fact that Spencer is a co-adjutor, his website has some good information on it. Spencer is like Alex Jones and John Loftus, who provide some good information, but never tell the whole truth.

[AVBibleBeliever]

Indeed, Spencer is a Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor fomenting hatred for all Muslims and his hateful rhetoric calls (when you read between the lines) for their eradication and genocide. I read up on Spencer-I thought he was Jewish initially but I checked out his webpage and learned that he actually is a Roman Catholic and denies he is a member of Opus Dei in this questionaire.
http://jihadwatch.org/spencer/
It is interesting you brought Spencer up because he will be speaking on my college campus tonight sponsored by its "Camels for Israel" aka Zionists of America chapter hence Spencer has the support of the Masonic Jewish Zionists of the Zionists of America which recently awarded U.S. UN Ambassador CFR John Bolton with a "Friend of [the Masonic Talmudic Jesuit-controlled Zionist government] Israel" Award, he also has that the Masonic B'nai Brith and their Anti-Defamation League (ADL). Spencer has been a guest on Vatican Radio and Jesuit-trained G. Gordon Liddy's radio show as well so he is a Papist who knows what he is doing and through propagating lies he is promoting the present Papal Crusade in the Middle East. Muslims are to this century what the Communists were in the last century in the minds of these Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors, Republican Fascists, and Democratic Communists like Jesuit-trained Patrick Leahy, Richard (Dick) Durbin, Illuminatus and witch sodomite Hillary Rodham Clinton etc. Muslims in general and not the Masonic Islamic leaders are perceived as a threat that needs to be contained. The language now used to describe what the fascist New Religious [Luciferian] Right Republican Party call "islamo-fascism" and the action that is encouraged is identical to the language employed to describe the Vietcong and the Vietnamese-different name but same line. Spencer is aiding in the spread of hate for all Arabs in general so Americans will be infuriated by hearing what some [another way of saying they, the perceived and created enemy] don't want you to hear-that's the bait that is meant to bring people to this talk. I might go just to take notes and report back to you about what he said.
Thank you Mark for exposing Robert Spencer and pointing him out as the Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor he most certainly, definitely is.

[Mark Brewer]

What appears by the left to be a war against Islam is actually a secret plot to strengthen Islam. Bush's wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have installed Sharia law in both of those countries. The right praises Bush's wars as victories over the terrorists. Both of those beliefs are based on the false assumption that there is a war against Islam. Have you ever noticed how Bush always says that al-Qaeda does not represent true Islam? This is being done to deceive Americans into believing that Islam is good. The Muslim world believes that Bush is a Zionist agent.
Many Muslims think that the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are true as well. Only the high ranking Muslims know what is really going on and are secretly working with the U.S. government.
Robert Spencer tells the truth about Islam, but he refuses to expose who is behind it. Bendict XVI is just as supportive of Islam as John Paul II was. Spencer also claims that Bush is fighting the evil jihadists.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadA...le.asp?ID=19841

[TruthSeeker24]

I believe Bush is an unversialists obviously. As for Islam, the leaders of the Muslim countries benefit from this war since they would still recieve profits if they tow the line. The poorer citizenry in the Islamic countries are definitely used as scapegoats for justification for this "war on terror." Not all Arabs in general are responsible for all terrorism. I'm just as disagreeing with Islam as anyone, but I still won't blame all Arabs in general for this "war on terror." Real Islamic threats aren't in this country, but within some Muslim countries themselves with political and religious persecutions primarily. Just like Jewish people are used as scapegoats when people in the ADL, etc. are secular Jews who are in full colloboration with the Jesuits (i.e. they aren't Torah Jews or Jewish Christians). Even Jim Hagee (people call him a Zionist supporter) admitted along with Rabbi Lapin that Jews who embrace secular humanism (i.e. ADL) are just as wrong as Muslim radicals.

[AVBibleBeliever]

The foreword of one of Coadjutor Robert Spencer's books "Inside Islam: A Guide for Catholics" was written by a Jesuit-Mitch Pacwa S.J.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/096...1783325-2026557

"The Vatican's New Realism About Islam" by Robert Spencer http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadA...le.asp?ID=10582
Spencer mentions the Jesuits and their "La Civilta Cattolica"

"Islam humiliates religious freedom of Christians and human rights of Muslims. It’s time for change" by Jesuit Samir Khalil Samir, SJ
http://www.asianews.it/view.php?l=en&art=5761
http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=43258
Coadjutor Spencer endorses this article
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/010821.php

Brother Nicholas N. Rivera

[Alexandra]

My understanding is that Rome wants Islam in its fold--after all, Muslims venerate Mary like Catholics do.

[Mark Brewer]

It is not Arabs that is the problem, but Islam. Most of the Arabs living in the United States do not practice Islam. In the future Islam, will be united with the Vatican even more than it already is. Remember how many heads of state from Muslim countries were at John Paul II's funeral? The leaders of Islam are already united with the Vatican.

[AVBibleBeliever]

Robert Spencer spoke on my college campus and he deliberately deemphasized Wahhabism. Spencer said that Wahhabism has been blamed unfairly and to do is a misapprehension (Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Spencer loves that word) he must have used it 3-5 times during his lecture on "The Jihad Threat" and during the Q&A afterwards. Spencer was arrogant, sarcastic, and did not have respect for his audience and those who had questions and comments.
I thought about asking him about his relationship to the Jesuits. I didn't but I after the fact I wish I had. I wasn't prepared at the time to engage in a debate with him. Roman Catholic Robert Spencer is a Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor based on the following facts.

1.The foreword of one of the books Coadjutor Spencer co-authored was written by a Jesuit Mitch Pacwa S.J.

2. Mark Brewer pointed out that Spencer falsely claims that Papal Antichrist Benedict XVI opposes Islam which is ludicrous. Islam is a creation of the Roman Catholic Church. I argue that it is nothing more than Arab-centric Romanism. Islam teaches purgatory, believes in saints, in Fatima, that the Pope is the vicegerent/Vicar of Jesus the prophet, uses prayer beads, etc. Islam serves the ends of the Papacy and the purpose for its creation was for the Arabs to do the bidding of Rome (capture Jerusalem) but not know it.

3. In this article coadjutor Spencer mentions and quotes from "Civilta Cattolica" which he calls a "semi-official Jesuit magazine" http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadA...le.asp?ID=10582
The Vatican's New Realism about Islam

4. Spencer has been on Vatican Radio.

5. During the Q&A a student mentioned "Christian Identity" (which is a cult and not Biblically Christian at all) and the Inquisition. Coadjutor Spencer said that system (the Inquisition) has not been active for centuries or something to that effect. Spencer is wrong. The Unholy Office of the Inquistion now the Congregation for the Doctrine of the (Romanist) Faith (cult) is very much in operation under the guise of Jesuit Medica which is war on everyone through allopathic poison and deadly vaccinations and foreign wars which the Jesuits use to punish and extirpate "heretics" according to the Council of Trent. The U.S. has been the tool of the Order to fulfill their bloody oath.

There is more evidence to be uncovered I'm sure that shows Robert Spencer is indeed a Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor fomenting fury against the Muslim peoples and calling for their destruction in this present Papal Crusade in the Middle East.

Brother Nick Rivera

[dlux]

Irony - I just love it!!

According to this book 'Cardinal' Mohammed started the Islamic religion. Bushby quotes from the writings of Mathew Paris an erudite english monk.

Finally found this;

http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/crucific.htm

Here is an excerpt from THE CRUCIFIXION OF TRUTH--Tony Bushby...
Chapter Thirteen--

"Today he is called Mohammed (570-632), but his real name was Lothar Schmalfuss.....The reference is found in a book called 'Chronica Majora', a summary of world history from biblical Creation to the year of the author's death. It was written by Matthew Paris (d.1259), a pious Christian monk, described by the church 'as an historian who holds the first place among English chroniclers'. From his quaint specimen of Abbey records, the erudite Monk explained how Mohammed started an 'impious religion':

It is well known that Mohammed was once a cardinal, and became heretic because he failed to be elected pope. Also (later in life) having drunk to excess, he fell by the roadside, and in this condition was killed by swine. And for that reason, his followers abhor pork even unto this day.

Monk Matthew Paris called Mohammed 'cardinal'; a term that today signifies councilors of the pope, and the origin of that category of priesthood reveals another area of censored information in Christian development. The 16th Century church said that 'the office of cardinal (incardinatus) first came into being in the 6th Century...its true origin to this day remains unanswered for in none of the Councils (records) do we find authority for the distinguishing features of the office'. However, the position of cardinal was created by special decree at a French synod in January 560 and that information is recorded church history. 'The Synods which were held during the sixth century were confined to France and Spain'....

...It was at one of those Synods that the 'creatio' of cardinals occurred and the deliberations involved in its manufacture were termed 'frivolous' by the 19th Century church. At that gathering a group of seven old bishops 'of carnal nature' established for themselves a special office to protect their earthly privileges. Many bishops of the time 'were given up to worldliness and gain, and we hear of worse scandals' and the creation of a new hierarchal administrative body of churchmen was one of those disgraces. Under the guise of 'bearers of hidden knowledge' they generated a new upper level class of ecclesiastics that were sworn by oath never to reveal the true origins of Christianity outside their select group. Professional clergymen were now entering the church and to protect the knowledge of Constantine's deification of his descendants at Nicaea from reaching new priests, a directorial code of silence was developed by the Incardinatus.
Incoming clerics were naive about the true Christian origins and the basis of their preaching was not revealed until they achieved and maintained the office of bishop. They were then eligible to enter the College of Cardinals, and after swearing a vow of secrecy, were enlightened as to the invented nature of the Christian deity. Mohammed had achieved the position of cardinal, knew the false essence of Christianity, and having being passed over for the top papal job at around the age of forty, departed and established his own religion."

The previous part of the book, as well as the rest of the book are just as amazing to those who truly are seeking truths--

I have left out the many footnotes in the above passage.

Kent, it would do the world good to take a good look at all religions...and who is behind them...and what purpose they really serve...to whom.

[Mark Brewer]

That Bushby material sounds fake. He is not the most reputable source of information and included a lot more books in the bibliography of The Bible Fraud than were quoted in the book. The best source of information about Islam is Prophet of Doom by Craig Winn.

http://www.prophetofdoom.net

Winn took the Koran and the Hadith and put it in chronological order. After reading the book you should understand why the Vatican loves Islam. You can listen to the book off of the website as well as read it.

Before the Prophet of Doom website was redesigned, there was a debate between Winn and Robert Spencer posted on there. It was because of this debate that I realized Spencer was not completely above board and later found out that he was a co-adjutor.

http://web.archive.org/web/20050210122146/...te_muslims.html

[dlux]

Thanks for the links Mark- I will check them out.


Bushby did live at the Vatican for a time when writing The Crucifixion of Truth & had access to all the vaults bar one. I tried to check out Mathew Paris & I came accross one comment that he liked the odd drop of 'red'. Sometimes it is hard to join the dots but over time the picture is formed.

Wonderful tool the www.

[Mark Brewer]

Since Bushby was allowed to live in the Vatican, that makes me think he is an insider. The Papacy would never allow people to live in the Vatican who will do it any real damage.