· Portal  Help Search Members Calendar 
Welcome Guest ( Log In  Register )  Resend Validation Email 
Welcome to Dozensonline. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access memberonly sections, and use many memberonly features such as customizing your profile, and sending personal messages. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. (You will be asked to confirm your email address before we sign you on.) Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: 
Pages: (2) 1 [2] ( Go to first unread post ) 
davidk 
Posted: Jun 26 2017, 02:31 PM

Casual Member Group: Members Posts: 132 Member No.: 1,157 Joined: 25October 15 
Hi Jim
you should look at the work of a man called Hugh Franklin who has worked all these numbers out that you quote in respect of the Great pyramid. They support your conclusions. http://members.tripod.com/hew_frank/ I have been working with Hugh and am about to release an e book about the eclipse https://www.amazon.co.uk/StonehengeCrackin...ords=megalithic It links to Hugh's Great Pyramid calculations. Do uou know about Wakefield? cheers Dave 
jim 
Posted: Jun 27 2017, 06:17 AM

Regular Group: Members Posts: 165 Member No.: 641 Joined: 20April 12 
Hi David
Thanks for the info I will reply under ancient measure and keep it in 1 spot. Yes I know Wakefield he's me. Jim 
davidk 
Posted: Jun 27 2017, 03:02 PM

Casual Member Group: Members Posts: 132 Member No.: 1,157 Joined: 25October 15 
At last we meet. I have championed your work for some time. Your posts could not have been by anyone else. Your rollrights to SH paper was jaw dropping when I read it a couple of years ago.
One of the base 12 imperial key units is 5280 / 360 and i note you have this. It gives 14.666r and is the eclipse unit a hidden system within the imperial which beyond reasonable doubt is a parallel system to Thoms. Simply multiply the imperial by 34/33 to get Thom's ancient system. The eclipse unit is the saros 6585.333r days / 449 and is most probably what they used instead of 223 x 29.5306 which is too difficult to count. It is hidden as 6600 in the chain. 14.666r / 22 x 7 = 4.666r so the system has base 10 as the circumference  diameter. All conscious numerical manipulation. cheers dave 
jim 
Posted: Jul 1 2017, 11:24 PM

Regular Group: Members Posts: 165 Member No.: 641 Joined: 20April 12 
Hey David
Amazon wont allow me to download your book says kindle store for uk customers only. OK got it now. 
davidk 
Posted: Jul 2 2017, 11:54 AM

Casual Member Group: Members Posts: 132 Member No.: 1,157 Joined: 25October 15 
Hi Jim
hope you find it OK there is a lot of stuff in there. You said 'The hectare and the acre. I began this topic by noting the combination of metric and imperial measure in the Louvre glass pyramid.' I think you have really got a hold on this, they do seem to work together and I think the imperial is represented by 39.60 and the metric by 39.370078 as you have shown So look at the number that makes the transfer from one to the other 39.370078 x 2.54 /2.5252525252r = 39.6 This is the switch between the two systems. 2.52525r x 4 = 10.101010r /10 = 100/99 and this is the link between the imperial and the hidden system. It is exactly the same link. I got accused of just playing with numbers by someone who does not appreciate the significance of 39.60. 3960 x 100/99 = 4000 3960 x 1.111r or10/9 = 4400 I hope you enjoy the book which is really about the work of Professor Alexander Thom and the system he discovered. He gave the Aubrey circl;e at Stonehenge at 897.60 feet x 100 = 89760. This is 330 x 272 but when it is turned to base 12, 330 becomes 3960 and 89760 becomes 1077120. 1077120 x 2.52525r = 2720000 in metric notation. 1077120 is also 1320 X 816 Thom's base number. 816 x fibonacci as 55/34 = 1320. These are Thom's numbers at Stonehenge but no one has noticed them. 89760/ 1.1 = 81600 81600 / 1.2 = 68000 the nodal; cycle. 1.1*1.2 = 1.32 The ancient unit the barleycorn features heavily in Hugh Franklin's workings as 1.1 / 3 = 0.366666r 1/4 of an eclipse unit and it is embedded in the inch as 3.666r x 0.2727272727r. I always thought the barleycorn was 1/3 of an inch but it is the Saxon inch 1.1 imperial inches. This thread started on 35.42. Thom surved and recorded the Ayebury monument with a team of helpers and it took him months. He recored the perimeter as 52.1 units of 6.8 (nodal cycle) 52.1*6.8 = 354.28 / 12 = 29.52333r one lunation. It converts to 364.7 using the Roman foot. 
Harold 
Posted: Jul 22 2017, 08:05 PM


Casual Member Group: Members Posts: 52 Member No.: 1,275 Joined: 25December 16 
That is exactly what you are doing, playing with numbers. anyone can take a series of meaningless numbers, multiply them and divide them together to get a desired result. It proves nothing. Ant serious mathematician and historian will laugh both of you out of the room. Imperial didn't even exist until 1824 and since then the dimensions have been changed numerous times, the last being in 1960. 

davidk 
Posted: Jul 24 2017, 12:45 PM

Casual Member Group: Members Posts: 132 Member No.: 1,157 Joined: 25October 15 
Hi Harold
You probably never heard of Alexander Thom. He was an Oxford professor of engineering science who retired early to survey as many megalithic sites in the UK as he possibly could. He was at the top pf his game. He discovered that megalithic sites were measured and laid out using a unit of exactly 2.72 imperial feet. He discovered a base 17 system of measurement was used. The imperial is base 16.5 using the imperial rod. Thom's system aligns exactly to the imperial using the ratio 16.5 to 17. You have probably never heard of Helen Mulholland. She is a Scottish archaeologist who has confirmed the use of the imperial system using the Scottish mile of 5920 feet by the Picts before the romans arrived in the UK. The Scottish rod is 18.5 feet so one mile 5920 / 18.5 = 320 The English rod is 16.5 feet so one mile 5280 / 16.5 = 320 Thom discovered a base unit of 17 feet so one mile 5440 feet / 17 = 320. Since Thom's system is definitely ancient and also Mulhollands is as well, is it not possible that the imperial system could have been around for a little bit longer than you are telling us? 
jim 
Posted: Nov 27 2017, 09:54 PM

Regular Group: Members Posts: 165 Member No.: 641 Joined: 20April 12 
Many people say that the metric system bears no relationship to the imperial.
I don't know who exactly designed the modern Metric system however I can see some of what they did and so I suspect there are some today who are initiated in a very ancient craft and the close study of astronomy, mathematics and geometry. The data comes from Herbert Arthur Klein's 'The Science of Measurement" p.128/129. The solar year 365.24 22 or 365 days, 48 minutes 45.5 seconds / pi = 116.2602031 and call this number imperial feet. 116.2602031 feet converts to 35.436108 modern metres and the same number as a lunar year 354.3 days. 35.436108 x 2 = 70.872216 now call this number imperial feet and 21.601851 metres. Here we see the kicker. 108 or half 216 metres. 108 metres = 354.3307 imperial feet a lunar year. There has to be more I just cant see it. Jim 
davidk 
Posted: Dec 1 2017, 07:54 PM

Casual Member Group: Members Posts: 132 Member No.: 1,157 Joined: 25October 15 
108 x 39.60 = 356.4
356.4 / 1.2 = 297 297 / 3 = 99 356.4/99*100 = 360 
jim 
Posted: Dec 3 2017, 01:18 PM

Regular Group: Members Posts: 165 Member No.: 641 Joined: 20April 12 
David
Quote '108 x 39.60 = 356.4' you have come up with the length of the third pyramid in imp feet. Thank you. And then made it to 360. ok and 360 can be got at with the ratio 24:25 ie 360 / 25 = 14.4 x 24 = 345.6. Jim 
davidk 
Posted: Dec 6 2017, 10:53 AM

Casual Member Group: Members Posts: 132 Member No.: 1,157 Joined: 25October 15 
Hi Jim
as you know my SH theory revolves around number 364 and finding number 91 at the Aubrey. It is about the persuavieness of the evidence and direct from Encyclopedia Brittanica is good especially when it is very very simple for the 3 Giza pyramids. 755.75 707.75 356.5 https://www.britannica.com/topic/PyramidsofGiza in total 1820 divide by 2 910. 91 x 4 = 364 x 8 = 2912 = 52 x 56. But the suggestion is more than one interpretation, in fact several depending on the scaling factors used. 755.75 707.75 355.75 the small pyramid factored from 356.5 to 355.75 a difference of 0.75 giving 1426 to 1423 755.75  707.75 = 48 707.75  355.75 = 352 48 + 52 = 400 352/400 = 0.88 imperial system 48/400 = 0.12 imperial system 352 is a key unit in predicting eclipses as it is 12 x 29.333r. As you say they are letting us know what they knew. The GP is scaled to SH and I have the scaling factor and it is based on Thom's megalithic yard  nothing else. they definitely pressed the simplify button. Their lunar count was 12 x 29.333r = 352 that can be got to using 144 352 feet in inches is 4224 / 12 = 352 /12 = 29.333r. very very simple. 144 is in fibonacci pi 352 x 3 = 1056 / 2 = 528 1.5 lunar years (eclipse) represented by 1/10 of an English mile. It answers the question Why 5280 feet in a mile? No wonder NASA won't change from this system. The key to the system is 132 and this is multiplied by 8/3 to get 352 and this is the eclipse year /12 = 29.3333r or 2 x the eclipse unit. the secret is understanding how they built 132 x 2.666r into their circles and it involves both the imperial and thom's units. They knew if they had a diameter of 132 the circumference would always be 352 and this is an eclipse prediction system. So they only neede to measure the diameter and this could be pointed anywhere you want it to ie most northerly moonset. the way they did it is relatively easy to work out 132 x 22/7 = 414.8571429 this had to be reduced to 352 and the unit required is 66/56 = 1.178571429 this divides to give 352. This unit x 16499/16500 is 1.1785 excatly the Harris and Stockdale megalithic foot i have set a thread up for. It is easy to get Thom's units into the system and discover SH. 352 x 0.17 does the trick as 59.84 x 5 = 299.2 and this is the Aubrey circle in yards so x 3 = 897.60 x 56/66 = 761.60 / 56 = 13.60 units between each postholes /34 x 33 = 13.20. So from the 3 pyramids to SH using everybody else's numbers. The megalithic yard and harris and stockdale's units work together to predict the eclipse. This is what Peter 's book is about. 
jim 
Posted: Dec 7 2017, 09:52 PM

Regular Group: Members Posts: 165 Member No.: 641 Joined: 20April 12 
Hi David
Quote '91 x 4 = 364 x 8 = 2912 = 52 x 56. But the suggestion is more than one interpretation, in fact several depending on the scaling factors used.' You know I would change this slightly 2912 is very close to the area of the base of the third pyramid in acres. And they kept using the combination of the numbers 3456. I am confident that the acre is also an ancient measure and the base of the third pyramid = 356.4 imperial feet 324 Saxon feet so to find the area of the base. 356.4 squared / 43560 = 2.916 acres 324 squared / 36000 = 2.916 acres 
davidk 
Posted: Dec 7 2017, 10:26 PM

Casual Member Group: Members Posts: 132 Member No.: 1,157 Joined: 25October 15 
I absolutely agree.
29.16 x 100/99 = 29.45454545 x 39.60 = 1166.4 divide by 9 = 129.6 a babylonian number the root of time. The circumference of the Aubrey circle is : The saxon yard x 100 x the megalthic yard. The saxon yard is 3.3 imperial feet x 2.72 x 100 = 897.60 imperial feet. This is the megalithic yard proof in a language you can understand Jim. The systems are working both horizontally and vertically. Moving up one level is 100/99 then back down using 10/9 1296/29.16 = 44.4444444444444444r This is not chance, the root of the system is 1.111111111111 or 10/9. 12960/1.5 = 86400 the number of seconds in a day Babylonian but put there much before. 
Pages: (2) 1 [2] 