Group: Admin
Posts: 639
Member No.: 1
Joined: 11-August 05
they are both incredible, the film is extrodinarily made. So there is no real difference to me, the book was also great and LOTR is one of my secret passions
Group: Sammii
Posts: 56
Member No.: 30
Joined: 14-October 05
Exactly, I hate when a book is really good, but has very boring parts. One part in LoTR was in the first one at the counsil of elders (I think that's what it was called)...I almost fell asleep reading it.
Group: Admin
Posts: 639
Member No.: 1
Joined: 11-August 05
lolz, I thought Lord of the Rings was done masterfully. Unlike harry potter films (angry me) Lord of the Rings had little to wish for, it was all there with very little missed out. (well Haldir wasnt at helms deep in the book...yet he died there in the film. Warg didnt attack on the way to helms deep. And where was barrows?? and Tom bombadil?? oh well I still loved the films.)
Group: Sammii
Posts: 53
Member No.: 35
Joined: 23-January 06
Yea the films where great. I think the harry potter films are quite good, but i must admit when they miss stuff out of the book i do get VERY annoyed...
--------------------
Theif, Gambler and General.
To the roll the dice is put your faith in Luck. Trust your luck and you win. (most of the time)
Group: Members
Posts: 48
Member No.: 50
Joined: 18-February 06
I fell asleep when I was reading LOTR, but the films were much better!! Harry Potter: was the most crapy Fimls ever!! and matrim has a point: LOTR books were boring